Section 1. Trusts, etc., in restraint of trade illegal; penalty
Section 2. Monopolizing trade a felony; penalty
Any property owned under any contract or by any combination, or pursuant to any conspiracy (and being the subject thereof) mentioned in section 1 of this title, and being in the course of transportation from one State to another, or to a foreign country, shall be forfeited to the United States, and may be seized and condemned by like proceedings as those provided by law for the forfeiture, seizure, and condemnation of property imported into the United States contrary to law.
Section 6a. Conduct involving trade or commerce with foreign nations
- such conduct has a direct, substantial, and reasonably foreseeable effect -(A) on trade or commerce which is not trade or commerce with foreign nations, or on import trade or import commerce with foreign nations; or (B) on export trade or export commerce with foreign nations, of a person engaged in such trade or commerce in the United States; and
- such effect gives rise to a claim under the provisions of sections 1 to 7 of this title, other than this section.
WE HAVE FOUND THAT WITH ONE (1) OR MORE WRITTEN STATEMENTS PRESENTED TO THE ARIZONA STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE (PHONE CALL), FROM, A STATEMENT FROM LETS SAY, A CASKET DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OR A FUNERAL ESCORT COMPANY (CIVIL DEPOSITION), OR A STATEMENT FROM A FORMER EMPLOYEE WITNESSING SAID COMMENTS OR ACTS BEING SAID OR DEMANDED UPON BY ANY BUSINESS, ITS OWNERS OR REPRESENTATIVES, REGARDLESS OF REASONING FOR SEPARATION OF THIS WITNESS OF THE ESTABLISHMENT BEING SCRUTINIZED, THIS IS PRESENTABLE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT A VIOLATION OF THE RESTRAINT OF TRADE LAW.
IF ANY STATEMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION SUGGESTING OR INSINUATING THAT ANY BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENT IS BEING FORCED BY A CONSUMER, ANY CONSUMER THAT THEY ARE BEING SUPPLIED BY AND HAS SINCE CEASED USING THEM "TO PROVIDE A SPECIFIC PRODUCT OR SERVICE, NOT NECESSARILY ALL PRODUCTS", DUE TO THIS UNSCRUPULOUS BUSINESS PRACTICES, TO SELECT ONE BUSINESS OVER ANOTHER THUS FORCING A SUPPLIER TO LIMIT THE TRADE OF ITS PRODUCT IS DEFINED AS A CONSPIRACY AND IS PUNISHABLE UNDER THE SHERMAN ANTI TRUST ACT OF 1890. AKA VIOLATION OF THE RESTRAINT OF TRADE LAW.
THE "DEMAND" IS THE VIOLATION OF THE LAW, NOT THE ACTION.
THIS IS ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO PURSUE LEGAL ACTION ON BEHALF OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA'S ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE, NOT ANY INDIVIDUAL, BUT THE STATE HAS LEGAL GROUNDS AND OBLIGATION TO PURSUE THIS TYPE OF CASE AGAINST THE VIOLATING ENTITY. THIS IS ONLY IF CONTACTED "BY ANYONE" AND PRESENTED WITH A CASE TO PURSUE. IN ARIZONA, THE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE VIGOROUSLY PURSUES THESE CLAIMS THAT ARE PRESENTED WITH EVIDENCE.
ANY STATEMENT CAN BE FORCED OUT OF A UNCOOPERATIVE PERSON THROUGH A CIVIL DEPOSITION IF NEED BE.
VIOLATION OF THIS LAW IS CONSIDERED A CLASS 4 FELONY.
FELONS CAN NOT OWN OR OPERATE A BUSINESS. FELONS CAN ALSO BE IDENTIFIED BY ANY MEANS BY ANYONE TO ANYONE AT ANY TIME BE IT VERBALLY OR IN PRINT.
CIRCA 1980, U.S. ATORNEY GENERALS OFFICE VS. ******** FUNERAL CHAPEL, TUCSON, AZ.